2012-10-05

Etnokultūras un novadpētniecības atzars ...

http://dievturi.blogspot.ca/http://dievturi.blogspot.ca/

piektdiena, 2012. gada 5. oktobris

Konference Lietuvas Seimā

2012 g. 8 oktobrī Lietuvas Republikas Seimā notiks konference “PIE DZIESMOTĀS REVOLŪCIJAS UN ATMODAS KUSTĪBAS SĄJŪDIS PIRMAVOTIEM. ROMUVAS UN 
ŽYGEIVIŲKUSTĪBĀM – 45”
Pasākumā piedalīsies Romuvas unŽygeiviu (novadpētniecības un tautiskuma veicinātāju) kustību dibinātāji, kuri aicinās atcerēties tautas atmodas un brīvības garo ceļu. Tajā viens no izteiktākajiem bija etnokultūras un novadpētniecības atzars, kurā īpaši iezīmējās Ramuvas unŽygeivių kustības, kurās iesaistījās daudz jauniešu. Pirms 45 gadiem ramuvieši Kernavē sarīkoja Rasas svētkus, kas pamatoti tiek uzskatīti par tālaika tautas atmodas un sevis apzināšanās sākumu, pamazām tika iedzīvinātas arī citas senās baltu svētes un tradīcijas. Kaut gan 1971. gadā Ramuvas kustība tika aizliegta,“nacionālisti” un novadpētnieki – vajāti, tomēr dziesmotās revolūcijas pamati jau bija ielikti: šī garīgā atmoda sagatavoja tautu turpmākajām pārmaiņām. Pēc Lietuvas neatkarības atjaunošanas radās iespēja pasludināt arī senās reliģijas atdzimšanu, un pirms 20 gadiem tika tiesiski atzīta arī Baltu reliģijas Romuva.
Aicinām piedalīties visus, kuriem svarīgas minētās vērtības. Aiciniet līdzi arī draugus, lai visus priecētu plašais domubiedru pulks!
Konferences sākums plkst. 11.00. Klātesošos uzrunās Birutė Burauskaitė, Romualdas Ozolas, Vacys Bagdonavičius, Ainė Ramonaitė, Nijolė Balčiūnienė, Gintaras Songaila, Antanas Gudelis, A.Patackas, J.Trinkūnas, J.Vaiškūnas, Valdas Rutkūnas u.c.
Dalībniekus Seima ēkā ielaidīs pēc saraksta, tāpēc aicinām reģistrēties pa tālruni 85216 29 66 un 867643430 vai
e-pastā :trinkunas@romuva.lt
.

2012-08-18

.ca ... tikai 2% netic Klimata Pārmaiņās


By Jennifer Graham, The Canadian Press, thecanadianpress.com, Updated: August-15-12 1:00 AM

Survey finds 2 per cent deny climate change

REGINA - Only two per cent of Canadians who responded to a new opinion poll believe climate change is not occurring.
The findings are in a survey conducted by Insightrix Research, Inc. for IPAC-CO2 Research Inc., a Regina-based centre that studies carbon capture and storage.
The online poll of 1,550 people was done between May 29 and June 11. The results were to be released on Wednesday.
"Our survey indicates that Canadians from coast to coast overwhelmingly believe climate change is real and is occurring, at least in part due to human activity," said centre CEO Carmen Dybwad.
Respondents were asked where they stood on the issue of climate change.
Almost one-third — 32 per cent — said they believe climate change is happening because of human activity, while 54 per cent said they believe it's because of human activity and partially due to natural climate variation. Nine per cent believe climate change is occurring due to natural climate variation.
Two per cent said they don't believe climate change is occurring at all.
The opinions about the cause of climate change and how to combat it are divided among the provinces and by region.
According to the survey, Prairie respondents are least likely to believe that climate change is occurring due to human activity, while residents of Quebec, Atlantic Canada and British Columbia are most likely to hold this belief.
The survey found 44 per cent of Quebec respondents, 34 per cent of Atlantic Canadian respondents and 32 per cent of those surveyed in British Columbia are likely to believe climate change is occurring due to human activity. Alberta and Saskatchewan came in at 21 per cent while Manitoba was at 24 per cent.
Unlike traditional telephone polling, in which respondents are randomly selected, the Insightrix survey was conducted online among 1,550 respondents, all of whom were chosen from a larger pool of people who agreed to participate in ongoing research. They were compensated for participating.
The survey set quotas by age, gender, region and education to match the general population.
The polling industry's professional body, the Marketing Research and Intelligence Association, says online surveys cannot be assigned a margin of error because they do not randomly sample the population.
The survey also found that 51 per cent of Canadians respondents across the country believe fossil fuels will still be used after the year 2050 for electricity production in Canada.
That belief is highest in Alberta at 66 per cent and lowest in Quebec at 37 per cent.
The acceptance of climate change and the extent to which humans are responsible for it has been a politically sensitive issue, most recently in the Alberta election.
Wildrose Party Leader Danielle Smith's team started strong in the campaign, but faltered near the end when Smith said the science of global warming was not settled. Smith found herself booed roundly at a late-stage leaders debate over the issue.
Former Alberta premier Ed Stelmach said Smith's refusal to admit climate change exists cost her party a shot at victory. He said voters agreed Alberta would have a big problem selling oil and promoting environmental stewardship on the world stage with a premier who didn't believe in climate change.

Radons izsauca vairāk vēzi (nāvi) nekā agrāki domāts.


By CBC News, cbc.ca, Updated: August-17-12 10:44 PM

Radon linked to more lung cancer deaths than previously thought

Radon linked to more lung cancer deaths than previously thought
New Health Canada research indicates there are hundreds more cases annually of lung cancer caused by indoor radon exposure than first determined in the late 1970s, prompting the agency to urge Canadians to check levels of the colourless and odourless gas in their homes.
Health Canada tests conducted in the late 1970s estimated that 10 per cent of lung cancers resulted from indoor exposure to the radioactive gas, which is produced naturally when uranium in the soil degrades. Radon is released from the ground into the outdoor air and can sometimes seep into homes.
However, the federal agency more accurately determined the levels of radon through tests of 14,000 homes across the country for two years starting in 2007. The testing, using long-term alpha track detectors, determined that more Canadians are exposed to radon concentrations above acceptable levels than previously recorded. As a result, the new estimate of lung cancers attributable to radon exposure is now 16 per cent.
Kelley Bush, head of radon education and awareness for Health Canada, told CBC News on Friday that roughly the same number of homes were tested in both undertakings. But the most recent testing is much more accurate than the 1970s "grab-sample testing," the only method available at the time.
In the recent long-term testing, Health Canada hired a firm that recruited participant homeowners, who were sent radon detectors to be used over a minimum of three months. Health Canada analyzed the results in a lab, and sent them to the testing participants.
Smoking is biggest lung cancer risk
The only factor considered in the study was smoking; other environment and industrial factors linked to lung cancer weren't taken into account.
"The bigger risk [of lung cancer] is always going to be smoking," said Bush. "Ultimately, these other environmental components that can impact lung cancer are much smaller than smoking and radon at the end of the day.
"The take-home message is radon is a very serious environmental health risk, but it’s very preventable. It’s easy and inexpensive to reduce the level [in the home] if it’s high."
Most of the 25,000 new lung-cancer cases and 20,000 lung-cancer deaths annually are caused by smoking, but radon is the next biggest cause of the biggest cancer killer of both men and women in Canada.
Based on Health Canada's latest testing, indoor exposure to the gas can be expected to cause more than 3,000 lung cancer deaths each year. If all homes with dangerous radon levels were "remediated to the outdoor level," 927 of the anticipated 3,261 radon-induced lung cancers could potentially be prevented per year.
The two-year testing also found seven per cent of the 14,000 homes had levels of radon above the acceptable level of 200 Becquerels per cubic metre of air (Bq/m³), up from three to five per cent in the 1970s testing.
Test homes to determine gas levels
Health Canada's national radon program, which began in 2007, aims to reduce lung cancer incidence by increasing public awareness of the dangers of exposure to excess levels of the gas over a long period of time. Canadians are also urged to test for radon levels in the home, by purchasing special testing devices, including at some home improvement stores, or hiring a certified radon measuring specialist.
Health Canada recommends that homes be tested for a minimum of three months, ideally during the winter as radon concentrations are more accurately measured during the cooler months.
Excess radon levels are more likely to be a problem in older homes. National building codes changed in 2010 require a special barrier of plastic be put under foundations to reduce the amount of gas that can enter a home.
Health Canada says the costs to reduce radon levels in the home depends on its size and design, and the work that is needed, but they typically range from $50 to $3,000, and can include:
- Installing a radon reduction system, consisting of piping from the foundation to the outside wall or roof. The system, which can cost up to $3,000 to install, helps draw gas from the ground and away from the home.
- Increase the mechanical ventilation, via a heat recovery ventilator, to allow an exchange of air.
- Seal all cracks and openings in foundation walls and floors, and around pipes and drains.
External Links


Medicīnas sistēmā neveiksmīga pacientiem UN ārstiem.



Our health system fails both doctors and patients

 

 
 
 
As divisive and angry debate continues to rage between Ontario’s doctors and government over cuts to the health-care budget, it is worth asking whether our current health-care system is, in fact, “healthy.” A successful and sustainable system must care for the needs of health-care practitioners and patients equally. As a physician, I have spent years on the front lines of Canadian health-care, and have struggled as much as anyone to compensate for the inadequacies of our system, ultimately becoming ill myself as a consequence.

In medical school, I learned the causes of illness, and exhaustive lists of the medications indicated to treat them. No problem seemed out of reach for modern, pharmaceutical-centric medicine: it was just a question of finding the right medication for the right symptom. “Health,” on the other hand, was rather taken for granted, assumed to be simply the absence of disease. The idea that physicians could themselves become ill was not discussed, and certainly never crossed my mind. Given the relentless demands of my job at the hospital, I found myself rushing headlong from work, to play, and back to work again.

“Modern illnesses” such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer have come to dominate the contemporary health-care picture, and although it is increasingly obvious that they are rooted in the same lifestyle and environmental causes, modern medicine still tends to treat them as separate and distinct. For example, for a patient with the right genes, the combination of sedentary lifestyle and our overly processed diet is a recipe for diabetes. Modern medicine’s response is to prescribe drugs such as glyburide and insulin, both known to lead to obesity and heart disease: should the diabetic then develop heart trouble, additional medications will be called for, and the prescriptions begin to snowball.
In my experience, it’s rare for patients on multiple medications to feel “better.” In fact, the more pills they take, the worse they often seem to feel. As I gradually came to terms with this contradiction, my early enthusiasm and idealism started to erode. I realized I was more a health manager than healer, prescribing escalating numbers and doses of medications for diseases that would never be cured. My involvement seemed to be expected only once poor health was firmly and irreversibly established, and then only to prescribe medications aimed at dealing with the symptoms rather than the underlying problem.

Gradually, I became not just disenchanted, but angry at the endless need, angry that the expectations of my patients so regularly exceeded my ability to help them. It was a feeling that ran counter to everything I believed about myself and about medicine. It didn’t occur to me that other physicians might have similar feelings; I just thought it was a personal failing. I worked harder to compensate, often to exhaustion. And my life went more and more to extremes: I isolated myself from family and friends, drank too much, rarely slept, and ate poorly.

I felt awful. I felt trapped. Finally, in April 2009 I had a “burnout,” and left the hospital. It was months before I could work again. I was physically and emotionally drained. More than this, I felt ashamed. To me, a doctor was someone who soldiered on in spite of everything, and to falter meant to fail both my patients and profession.

It took me a long time to recover. With help, I pieced my life back together bit by bit. I saw a therapist. I started meditating. I realized that far from representing a “failure,” my experience had been an invaluable lesson in what really constitutes health and well-being. I also realized that I was not alone: according to one study, 45 per cent of Canadian doctors have symptoms of advanced burnout.
Not every doctor reacts to the stress of hospital life as negatively as I did. However, it’s worth asking whether we can continue to expect physicians and other health-care workers to fill the gaps in our health-care system — gaps that are only widening as the government tries to rein in spending while the demands of the population continue to grow.

For my part, I feel healthy today — healthier than I ever did before my burnout. What seemed like “the end” turned out to be a beginning. Out of my efforts to rebuild my own health has emerged a new practice, one focused on lifestyle change and natural remedies, and one that respects my needs as much as those of my patients. And where my life once felt empty and unhealthy, it is now full and satisfying.

Such a transformation is also needed for modern health care. The media’s current focus on OHIP fees for doctors overlooks the fact that “success” in the doctor-patient relationship can’t be measured in dollars and cents. The health-care system must promote not just the well-being of the patient, but also of the practitioner: it’s hard to point the way to health if you are not healthy yourself.

Marc Engfield, MD, is an integrative medical doctor in Ottawa. Email: DrEngfield@yahoo.ca.

Ķīnas auto austrālijā ar asbestu ...



23,000 Chinese cars recalled in Australia: 
asbestos found in parts
Carcinogen initially found in spare parts, 
sparking wider investigation

BY ASSOCIATED PRESS ON AUGUST 15, 2012 7:03AM

SYDNEY, Australia: An Australian importer recalled 23,000 Chinese-made cars after asbestos was found
inside engine and exhaust gaskets, the nation’s consumer watchdog said.

Ateco Automotive, which imports the cars made by Great Wall Motor Co. and Chery Automobile, ordered
dealers to stop selling the affected vehicles and recalled gaskets that were distributed as spare parts, the
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said in a statement.

“The asbestos is bound into gaskets in the engine and exhaust system and does not present any risk to
consumers during use of the vehicle,” the watchdog agency said. “However, consumers should not perform
do-it-yourself maintenance that might disturb these gaskets.”

Australia has prohibited the importation of asbestos – a known carcinogen – since 2004.

The recall is a blow to Great Wall and Chery, which have been looking to expand their businesses beyond the domestic market.

Customs officers initially detected the asbestos in imported spare parts, which sparked a wider investigation,
the consumer commission said.